Buy - Bissell FeatherWeight Vacuum, Bagless, 3106B

Buy - Bissell FeatherWeight Vacuum, Bagless, 3106B Item
Description	"Price: ","$24.99 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details " [EXTRACT] Product Description The FeatherWeight is designed to be your "go to" vacuum for quick clean-up throughout your home. It easily converts to go anywhere you need it. The Bissell FeatherWeight provides the versatility of a stick vacuum, hand vacuum, and with the included crevice tool, a vacuum that easily gets into those hard to reach areas. [EXTRACT] Product Details Amazon Sales Rank: #1505 in Home Color: Storm Blue Brand: Bissell Model: 3106B Number of items: 1 Dimensions: 29.25" h x 5.00" w x 5.75" l, 5.00 pounds Features Lightweight vacuum great for quick cleanup of everyday messes Perfect for carpets, hard floors and upholstery Includes 1.2 amps; includes 16-foot power cord Easily converts into a hand vacuum Measures 5.8" x 5" x 29.2", weighs 4.6 pounds and is backed by a 1-year long warranty [EXTRACT] Amazon.com Product Description For picking up everyday spills and messes, the bagless Bissell FeatherWeight Vacuum is an ideal choice. Affordably priced and equipped with a 16-foot power cord that stretches into the farthest corners of your home, the attractive blue FeatherWeight sucks up crumbs, dirt, dust, pet hair, kitty litter, and almost anything else that can get dumped on your floor. Works great on carpets, bare floors, and upholstery. For stairs or furniture, just remove the quick-release handle and use the FeatherWeight as a convenient hand vacuum. 1.2-amp power rating. 5.8 x 5 x 29.2 inches. 4.6 pounds. Limited 1-year warranty. [EXTRACT] Customer Reviews Most helpful customer reviews 125 of 126 people found the following review helpful. My favorite house-cleaning tool. By Ruth Henriquez Lyon I have used this every day for years (I can't remember how many--but at least four years). I recently bought a new one only because I was afraid of scratching my floors due to the rollers not turning as well as they had before. I moved the old one down to my basement work area, and use the new one in the main living areas. I have three dogs (previously four) and two house rabbits, all of whom go through times of heavy shedding. During those times I sometimes vacuum certain areas twice a day. There has never been any maintenance problem with this vacuum cleaner. The suction is strong enough for me to do my rag rugs and area rugs, and the rollers don't scratch my wood floors. It's easy on my back, conveniently converts to a hand vac, and is easy to take out and use at a moment's notice (no tedious unwinding of long cord). One reviewer did write that this vacuum is hard to clean. I clean mine by dumping the bulk of the debris into the trash, then vacuuming the filter periodically with my Kenmore heavy-duty vacuum cleaner. The chamber holds a lot of dust, so even when my pets are heavily shedding, I don't empty it more than every 2 - 3 days. If I only could have one vacuum cleaner, this would be it. 156 of 162 people found the following review helpful. It Does Suck... By willie and that's a good thing... i have this model, a 3106-1 - the Bissell Featherweight Bagless, and a very similar model from the same manufacturer (both are made in China), the 38B1-3 - the Bissell 3-in-1 Vac... these are nearly identical and cost exactly the same locally and on-line... i say 'nearly identical,' as they weigh the same, have the same length cord, share the same ergonomics (handle, cord storage, assembly, emptying, etc.), and similar suction... rest assured that this model will work just as well, if not better than the 3-in-1... but here are the differences: - this model has a 1.2A motor, whereas the 3-in-1 has a 2A motor - nod to 3-in-1 - both models come with a crevice tool, as does the 3-in-1 - even score - this model has an opaque canister, so you cannot see how much dirt has been vac'd, whereas the 3-in-1 is translucent - nod to 3-in-1 - one star off on my review - both models are easy to empty - even score - parts, accessories, and manuals are available on-line through Bissell - good job! BUT the replacement dirt filter for the 3-in-1 is $3 cheaper ($2.99 vs $5.99)!!! nod to the 3-in-1 - both models lack a lanyard hole or ring in the handle for easy storage - both will slide off the wall more than not if you try to store upright - what was the designer thinking? heck, even the Swiffer Vac has a little handle ring (and it is a worthless POS - AVOID!) the fix: drill a hole through the handle - therefore, another star off my review but considering the cost, ease of use, ease of cleaning, performance, and light weight of these little corded buggers - which are much better than the over-priced Eureka rechargeable Vac (which you will be throw away in less than a year), i rate this vac a GOOD BUY! 105 of 109 people found the following review helpful. An Excellent Second Vacuum Cleaner By Lawrence H. Bulk My wife and I are very, very pleased with this lightweight vacuum cleaner. I should like to tell you how we came to buy it and why we are so happy with the purchase. Recently my wife stated that she wanted a second lightweight vacuum cleaner for quick touch-ups in addition to our two main Eureka 4870MZ Boss Smart-Vac Upright HEPA Vacuum Cleaners. (We live in a two-story house and keep one of these relatively heavy vacuum cleaners on each level.) We saw a Shark Multi-Vac, NH15 advertised at a very low price (even lower than Amazon's!) at a local "big-box" store but after doing some research here on Amazon, we saw so many customer complaints about this product (even from some who liked it), especially as regards changing the configuration, emptying the dust cup, and changing the filter, that we decided against buying it. (It seemed to us that this product was of very poor design.) After much more extensive research of Amazon customer reviews of many of these lightweight vacuum cleaner products, we decided to consider two: this Bissell FeatherWeight Vacuum, Bagless, 3106B and a Eureka Lightweight Easy Clean Upright Vacuum Cleaner. However, we could not decide, from the descriptions and reviews, which of the two would be "better" so we bought one of each! (We decided that it would be much more convenient to have one of these smaller vacuums on each level, an easy decision given their low prices.) Now Amazon may have thought we were going to try each and return the one we didn't like. We had no such intention. And, in fact, we like both of them and we shall keep both of them. Both of these are so easy to assemble right out of the box that few, if any, people would even need to look at the instruction manual. They both assemble easily and their parts fit together perfectly. Now there are some design differences which do not make themselves apparent until after you actually own the products. In our opinions, the Eureka is better designed physically than is the Bissell. The Eureka has a telescoping handle so that it is much easier to change the configuration to use as a handheld or as an upright. This has two further benefits: 1) you do not need to store the handle separately when using the vacuum as a handheld and 2) you can wrap the cord for storage with the handle extended or collapsed. You cannot do these two processes with the Bissell. You must physically remove the handle to use it as a handheld and you must replace the handle in order to wrap the cord for storage. Not that this would be a "deal-breaker" but it is an inconvenience, especially when compared to the Eureka. In addition, due to the placement of the cord on the Bissell, wrapping it for storage is somewhat awkward, again, however, certainly not a "deal-breaker." However, my wife feels that the plastic used for the Bissell's construction is of a much higher grade than is that used on the Eureka. In addition, the Bissell FeatherWeight and Easy Mate Filters are sold at a low price conveniently here on Amazon (we bought extras) but those for the Eureka are not. (The filters for both vacuums are washable by hand and would not need to be replaced until they wore out.) It is somewhat less awkward to empty the dust cup on the Eureka than it is with the Bissell. Replacing the filter on both is easy and convenient. My wife has complained that both vacuums have relatively short cords which may, in some parts of our house, require the use of an extension cord. Also she complains that neither has a place to store the included crevice nozzle. But ALL of these quibbles, especially as regards the slight inconveniences of the Bissell vs. the Eureka, are quite minor and are certainly forgivable in view of their VERY low prices. (The Bissell is less expensive than the Eureka but in our opinions both offer excellent value for money.) Really, at least according to us, it is a "photo-finish" as regards their vacuuming performance - excellent at what they are designed to do - and desirability. Now we have read that some people have complained that these lightweight stick vacuums do not deep clean carpets well. Of course they don't! That is NOT what they are designed to do. As I stated, this Bissell model does a simply excellent job at its actual intended purpose: cleaning of bare floors and light touch-ups on carpets. So does the Eureka. Obviously, as we received these units just two days ago, we cannot comment on their longevity. Were the Bissell to fail prematurely, I would update this review. So, if you are considering buying one, both my wife and I give our wholehearted recommendation to this little Bissell unit (as well as to the Eureka model). I thank you for reading this and I hope that it is of some help to you. See all 136 customer reviews...
Available Stock	1000
Misc

Best Buy Ray Ban

View